|

Funds Centre

Performances as at: 20/06/2008

Data provided by:

Morningstar

Funds Centre Navigation

Wealth 150 Funds

All Funds

Breadcrumb Trail

Funds provided by Martin Currie Investment Mgmt

Funds provided by Martin Currie Investment Mgmt
Performance1
Fund Name Morningstar Rating2 Fund Rating3 Annual Management Charge (%) 1 Year Change (%) Quartile Rank over 1 Year 3 Years Change (%) Quartile Rank over 3 Years Performance Details
Martin Currie GF Glbl Resources Not rated Not rated 1.5 22.71 3 154.44 3 Performance Details for Martin Currie GF Glbl Resources
Martin Currie GF Gtr China 2 stars Not rated 1.5 -8.94 4 64.33 4 Performance Details for Martin Currie GF Gtr China
Martin Currie GF Japan $ 2 stars Not rated 1.5 -12.76 2 1.27 3 Performance Details for Martin Currie GF Japan $
Martin Currie GF JapMidCap ¥ 4 stars Not rated 1.5 -16.85 4 -2.78 4 Performance Details for Martin Currie GF JapMidCap ¥
Martin Currie GF Pan Eurp Alph € 4 stars Not rated 1.5 -7.99 2 50.2 1 Performance Details for Martin Currie GF Pan Eurp Alph €
Martin Currie GF Pan-Euro Opp Y 4 stars Not rated 1.5 -13.17 4 65.45 1 Performance Details for Martin Currie GF Pan-Euro Opp Y
Martin Currie GF UK Growth 1 stars Not rated 1.5 -16.31 4 5.36 4 Performance Details for Martin Currie GF UK Growth

Notes about the table

1All performances are expressed as percentage change, calculated in sterling on a bid-to-bid basis with dividend income reinvested gross of any applicable taxes. Quartile rankings descend from 1 (top 25%) to 4 (bottom 25%).

2The Morningstar Rating are a rating of the risk-return profile of a fund, calculated using a fund’s monthly performance relative to its sector average for each of the 36 months over the three years to date. The average and volatility of these 36 numbers is used to calculate a fund’s star rating. More stars are better. You may wish to read further about the history of the fund star ranking.

3Fund Ratings aim to identify investment funds that have provided consistently strong performance year after year relative to a meaningful peer group. You may wish to read more about the fund rating process.