skip to main content
|

After you're retired

Moneywise
Message Boards
Property Pensions
Savings Utilities
UK Stocks Investments
Speach bubble clear all debts then save or both?
Speach bubble Split in assets...
Speach bubble Gold Shares
Speach bubble Liquidity or Solvency?
Speach bubble GaBumping
Speach bubble when is the best time to SPEND
View boards: Your Money UK Stocks

Moneywise Promotion
The latest issue of Moneywise is out now
Subscribe online now

Also on Yahoo! Finance
Mortgages Insurance
Loans Credit Reports
Credit Cards Banking
Savings Cut Your Bills

Pension Planning
Boost your state pension
Get the taxman to pay into your pension
Are public sector pensions too generous?
Put some life into your pension

View archive

Estate planning
Why you should write a will
How trust laws will affect IHT plans
Limit your Inheritance Tax bill
Can you afford to die?

View archive

After you're retired
Get set and go for retirement
Will care costs wipe our assets?
An unsecured pension dilemma
Annuities: boost your pension in one simple step

View archive

Will care costs wipe our assets?

Send Article by Email  |  Send Article by IM  |  Blog This with Y! 360  |  Printable View

PL, Bucks: Having transferred our house to a 'tenants-in-common' ownership some time ago, it now occurs to me, as I am approaching old age and possible infirmity, that we could have made a serious mistake.

If, as time goes on, I find myself in the situation of requiring full-time residential care, my wife would probably wish to move to a smaller property. In view of the current housing market, it is unlikely she would be able to buy anything at around 50% of our current house value.

As we may have received assistance with my accommodation from our local authority, we would surely be required to repay some of this using my assets (50% of the house), thus preventing my wife from purchasing a smaller property.

Is there any way in which the liability to repay my accommodation costs can be rolled over until after the sale of this second and smaller house - that is, upon her death?

Matt Pitcher, IFA at Towry Law, Bracknell: There is a possibility that if funds were raised from the downsizing of your property, the local authority would expect to receive some of your share of the released cash. It is unlikely that they would request the full value of your half of the property as your wife would need the funds to reinvest in the new, albeit cheaper, house.

Although there are horror stories about local authority care funding, most authorities will take a practical approach and work with the family. If you are seriously concerned about this then you should seek legal advice from a suitably qualified solicitor.

It may simply boil down to a question of finding the lesser of two evils - do you try to save on inheritance tax or do you remove any doubt over long-term care funding?

There was a recent case where HM Revenue & Customs challenged the use of tenants-in-common and a will trust successfully. The basis of their claim was that the wife in the partnership could not own 50% of the property as she had not contributed this amount financially. We are all watching to see how this develops - and it may be sensible for you to do the same.

Send Article by Email  |  Send Article by IM  |  Blog This with Y! 360  |  Printable View

Yahoo! Finance : Pensions
  Previous article : An unsecured pension dilemma ( Moneywise)
Yahoo! Finance : Pensions
  Next article : Women can beat pension gap ( Moneywise)

Archives of