skip to main content
|

Financial News

Sunday February 15, 03:47 AM
In defence of bonuses: experts warn on banker pay caps

By Katherine Haddon

Photo
Click to enlarge photo

LONDON (AFP) - From Britain to the United States and France, political leaders are clamping down on the bankers' bonus culture they say helped cause the credit crunch -- but some experts warn this could be counterproductive.

The screw-tightening comes amid public fury at big payouts -- thousands of people have joined groups on the Facebook Internet site with names like "Bankers Are Leaches", "Impudence: The Act Of UBS Bank" and "No Ifs, No Buts -- Give Up The Bonus, RBS (LSE: RBS.L - news) ."

Photo
Click to enlarge photo

But taking too tough a line with banks could have unintended consequences for taxpayers according to academics and insiders, who say the risks include banks losing their best staff and their share prices falling even lower.

Scenting public anger, political leaders worldwide have had harsh words for bankers who handed out hefty rewards even as the world economy started to tank.

US President Barack Obama last month branded the behaviour of Wall Street bankers "shameful" and is imposing a half-million dollar (391,000 euro) salary cap on executives at firms which have received a Treasury bailout.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has pledged to end the "short-term bonus culture" and backs a "clawback" system, under which bankers may have to pay back historic bonuses if it turns out they made bad decisions.

His government has announced a review of bank governance, including bonuses.

Meanwhile, French President Nicolas Sarkozy has told bank bosses to forgo 2008 bonuses as a condition of receiving state loans, while a new code of conduct for traders' salaries is being introduced.

But experts warn clamping down too hard could have some adverse effects, starting with the best bankers quitting state-owned employers in search of better bonuses at privately-owned competitors.

Peter Hahn, a fellow at Cass Business School in London and ex senior Citigroup (NYSE: C - news) banker, used the example of Britain's Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), now 68 percent state-owned, to show how a flight of talent may work.

"If I'm Barclays (LSE: BARC.L - news) or HSBC (LSE: HSBA.L - news) or anyone who's got by without state money, if I was a CEO I would send an order down and say 'what's RBS good at?'" Hahn told AFP. "I'd pick off all the people who aren't going to get bonuses."

David Marsden, professor of industrial relations at the London School of Economics, agreed, saying: "The big unknowns about capping relate to the ability of the capped banks to recruit and retain their star dealers and managers if other banks do not cap bonuses."

Caps at state-controlled banks could also affect the way staff take decisions there, again with implications for their de facto owners, the taxpayer.

Hahn said it was important for banks to "take the right kind of risk".

"If you're the head of a major bank and you don't get paid for risk, your incentive is just to be ridiculously conservative," he added.

"You want banks to understand and regulate risks but you want them to take risks because that funds growth in the economy."

Some argue that, when the upturn does finally come, banks which are majority state-owned may be in a downward spiral and ill-placed to capitalise on it. This would make it hard for governments to sell on their stakes and recoup their money.

"Be careful not to let your desire to punish City boys get in the way of clear thinking," former Cantor Fitzgerald trader Venetia Thompson wrote in Britain's Spectator magazine this month.

"It is the new owners of these public sector banks, the taxpayer... who will ultimately lose out.

"Their shares will continue to plummet and ultimately result in costing the government and the taxpayer even more."

Others say that, despite all the political heat and light they have attracted, bonuses are only part of a much bigger problem.

"Bonuses are important but we must not let them distract attention from reform of the whole business," Marsden said. "One has to ask also why other management control systems were not functioning properly."

Send Article by Email  |  Send Article by IM  |  Blog This with Y! 360  |  Printable View

Full Coverage : World Economies
Full Coverage : Business News for Mobile
  Previous article : Dollar retreats as Europe gains confidence ( )
  Next article : First results in Swiss vote indicates 'yes' for EU labour: TV ( )
Yahoo! Finance : Economic News
  Previous article : Russia vs the market in battle of the ruble ( )
  Next article : Obama heading west to promote foreclosure fight ( )
Yahoo! Finance : Yahoo! Finance - News - Commentary
  Previous article : US housing starts, permits post unexpected jump ( )
Yahoo! Finance : Yahoo! Finance - Aerospace and Defense Sector
  Previous article : BAE net profits sky-rocket in 2008 ( )
  Next article : Rolls-Royce reports loss of 1.34 bln pounds ( )
Full Coverage : Headline News

AFP logo

Barclays
BARC.L
317.55
+1.13%
Citigroup Inc
C
4.21
+0.00%
Hsbc Holdings
HSBA.L
738.20
+0.16%
Royal Bank Of Scotla...
RBS.L
36.00
-0.84%
FTSE 100  Gainers  Losers
FTSE 250 Quotes by Sector
Dow Jones  Nasdaq  S&P 500
DAX 30   Eurostoxx 50
 

Recession

  Just how deep is the trough?
Banking Crisis
 

Are the banks out of the woods?

Stock Market Crash
  Explaining the global market turmoil
Money saving Tips
 

How to beat the credit crunch

Isn't Finance Funny?
 

Scandals and silliness


Message Boards
Property Pensions
Savings Utilities
UK Stocks Investing
Speach bubble GDP Contracts - Recession Still On !
Speach bubble Average Rates On Mortgages < 5%
Speach bubble Best Sin - Points Awarded
Speach bubble They are getting ready to kill us
Speach bubble The day is near, so beware you Sinners


Archives of

Copyright © 2009 AFP AFP. All rights reserved.